In the 1936 Political Testament of Adolf Hitler, he said this about China “Pride in one’s race – and that does not imply contempt for other races – is also a normal and healthy sentiment. I have never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being inferior to ourselves. They belong to ancient civilizations, and I admit freely that their history is superior to our own. They have the right to be proud of their past, just as we have the right to be proud of the civilization to which we belong. Indeed, I believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I shall find it to get on with them”
So if Hitler did not view the Chinese as inferior then why are White Nationalists opposed to interrelations with Asians? Science shows that the Chinese have an average I.Q. of 107; for Europeans, this is generally around 100 (still admirable).
In concern to inventions, it should be noted that the Chinese have contributed a great deal to the advancement of civilization as a whole BUT they considered all other nations (including Europeans) to be inferior to their race and barbarians. The Great Wall of China was not just built to protect their nation from invasion but the Chinese people did not believe adhering to worldviews contrary to their “enlightened” and master views would be beneficial therefore The Great Wall served to keep “inferior peoples” out of their nation.
Science shows that DNA sequence chains are IDENTICAL between the Chinese people and European people (this is only true with the Chinese, not other Asian groups)
So my question is how can one not see that, if anything, the Chinese people on average are more intelligent than Europeans and would it not be beneficial for a “Master Race” if the Chinese and people of European ancestry had relations together?
What logic can you use to say the Chinese are inferior? Hitler even stated the were not inferior and that their history is indeed superior to Germanic history.